”
V. CONCLUSION
For these reasons, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 57) is GRANTED in part; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Mary Starr is DISMISSED with prejudice; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s official capacity claims as to all Defendants are [*44] DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is further
ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 57) is otherwise DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 28, 2023 Syracuse, New York
/s/ Brenda K. Sannes Brenda K. Sannes
Chief U.S. District Judge
“
read the entire article
United States District Court for the Northern District of New York 28 February 2023.